Persistent Slabs
- Alta quota
- Limite del bosco
- Sotto il limite del bosco
- Probabilità
- Likely
- Dimensione
- 1–2
Don't be fooled by sunnier skies. We are in the midst of an active loading period with strong-extreme wind from the west. Poor snowpack structure exists on all aspects at middle and upper elevations, and many slopes are being tested by heavy slabs forming on top. We got a taste of what wind loading did to the weak snowpack shortly after the storm earlier in the week, where wind slab avalanches failed within weak snow. Some of these avalanches were remotely triggered and propagated widely during avalanche control work at Mission Ridge.
All steep open terrain is suspect, including moderately treed areas where strong wind has snuck its way in. A change to denser feeling snow underneath your equipment is a good indication that it has been influenced. Avalanches could be triggered from below or next to steep slopes. Small, steep test slopes or convex features can help gauge the reactivity of the upper snowpack. You can dig small hand pits and pull on blocks of snow to see how easily overlaying slabs break free from weak snow underneath. But given snowpack variability, be cautious about extrapolating your results too broadly.
It might be more likely to trigger smaller fresh wind slabs independent of buried weak layers on Friday. However, the potential consequences of being caught and carried are the same. You should be concerned about triggering true wind slab avalanches in the same places where you could trigger a larger persistent slab avalanche.
(2/23/2026)
Very steep and unsupported test slopes such as this can be a way to guage reactivity of buried weak layers.
Photo: Katie Warren