Avalanche forecast

Southeast Mountains

Crested Butte Avalanche Center
View on map

Avalanche danger

Wed
Alpine
2 · Moderate
Treeline
2 · Moderate
Below
1 · Low
Out of date — this forecast expired 6 years ago. You’re viewing past conditions, not the current bulletin.

Highlights

Human-triggered avalanches remain possible particularly near and above treeline where deeper accumulations and winds have formed cohesive slabs resting over a widespread layer of weak snow.  Slabs have become isolated on low elevation slopes making triggered slab avalanches unlikely, BUT not impossible.  If you choose to enter avalanche terrain, you can reduce the consequences of a triggered avalanche by picking smaller slopes that are free from terrain traps like rocks, trees, or gullies.

Avalanche problems

  • Persistent Slabs

    • Alpine
    • Treeline
    • Below treeline
    Likelihood
    Possible
    Size
    1–2

    On or near steep, leeward terrain features, you can trigger persistent slabs 1 to 3 feet thick that fail on weak snow near the ground.  Persistent slabs often surprise even the most experienced travelers: They give irregular feedback, they can propagate unusually wide distances, and they can be remotely triggered from below or adjacent to the slope.  To avoid this problem,  choose routes that stay off of, and out from underneath, steep terrain holding dense slabs over sugary weak layers.  In the Southeast Mountains the thickest and most reactive slabs will be on previously wind loaded slopes that face north through southeast.  Slabs below treeline or on windward aspects are less common and smaller.     Shooting cracks and collapses are clear warning signs to stay on slope angles less than about 35 degrees, although their absence isn't a guarantee of safety. 

    Remotely triggered Persistent Slab avalanche above West Brush Creek on a drifted, easterly slope. 1/3.

Avalanche Discussion

The danger rating for below treeline slopes has been dropped to LOW for the Southeast Mountains but remains at MODERATE for the Northwest Mountains.  LOW danger doesn't imply there is NO avalanche danger.  To be more a bit more precise, the Persistent Slab problem below treeline has slowly, over two weeks of cold and dry weather, become isolated across the terrain due to slabs faceting away.  Most slabs existed on north and east aspects, so if you were to find this isolated problem expect it to be on those aspects.  For terrain on Mount Emmons, Anthracite Mesa, and Snodgrass,  and Carbon Peak (terrain in SE mountains that directly borders NW mountains), slabs were a bit more substantial, to begin with, due to increased snowfall thus are more likely to linger a bit longer.  Below treeline slopes that received a bit of wind effect at some point may also hold on to slabs a bit longer.  The highest elevation band for below treeline slopes just below 11,000' maybe another place slabs could linger a bit longer.  If you are feeling slabs when pole probing through the terrain, you may be near a place where you can still find the isolated Persistent Slab problem below treeline in the Southeast Mountains.  Collapsing is a sign that the Persistent Slab structure still exists.  The expected size of an isolated slab avalanche in this terrain is small, but even small avalanches can pose a hazard if terrain traps are involved. 

The last loading event was about 6 days ago.  This loading event largely impacted leeward terrain features at upper elevations due to northerly winds transporting new snow with the most snow falling in the Northwest Mountains with up to 7 inches accumulated near Irwin and Paradise Divide.  Below treeline slopes received very little snow from this event, only a few inches.  These factors make previously drifted near and above treeline features the most concerning and suspect.  Here are two observations from this loading event with a couple of skier-triggered avalanches and a large, natural avalanche.  Stability tests and signs of instability are showing improvement, but the evidence does not suggest that slabs are unreactive to the weight of a person or machine.  Predicting which slopes hang in the balance and which slopes have reached a temporary equilibrium is a challenging and complex decision.  A good way to look at decision making for traveling on upper elevation slopes, where you should be certain that slabs exist, is to think about consequences and less about likelihood.  Understanding the likelihood of triggering an avalanche on a given leeward slope remains a bit of a guessing game whereas judging the consequences of triggering an avalanche is a bit more straightforward.  If you are uncertain about the chances of triggering an avalanche on near and above treeline slopes then consider the consequences of being wrong.  Are there terrain traps like trees, cliffs, or gullies?  Is the slope large and offer the potential for a long-running avalanche?  Your best tool for managing uncertainty is with thoughtful terrain selection that leaves room for error.  

Regions covered