Persistent Slabs
- Alpine
- Treeline
- Below treeline
- Likelihood
- Possible
- Size
- 2–3
It is easy to fall into a sense of complacency with a Persistent Slab problem. Although we haven’t seen a natural persistent slab avalanche cycle recently, it is important to maintain conservative terrain choices, even when the instability appears unreactive. The potential to trigger a large to very large avalanche is possible if you find a thinner part of the slab on top of the February 3rd crust/facet combo.
Signs of instability are inconsistent, creating a problem that may be difficult to manage. You may or may not see recent avalanches during your travels, or cracking/collapsing before triggering a slope. In addition, it could be the 1st, 2nd, or 10th person on the slope that triggers an avalanche that fails on the buried weak layer.
The February 3 crust/facet combo is buried 2 to 4 feet below the snow surface. Another facet/crust exist about 1 foot below the surface and was the culprit for a few human-triggered avalanches last week.
The safest way to manage this Persistent Slab problem is to choose slopes with lower slope angles and ones that aren't in the runout of large avalanche paths.
(3/7/2024)
The crown of a hard slab avalanche that failed during the intense wind loading event of February 28 or 29. This crown spans over 1000 feet wide and wraps around several terrain features.
Photo: Mark Dundas