Storm Slabs
- Alpine
- Treeline
- Below treeline
- Likelihood
- Likely
- Size
- 1.5–2.5
Small and large natural, human-triggered, and remote avalanches occurred over the last few days, including a partial burial in the Baker backcountry on Friday. The snowpack is complicated right now, and what we're looking at is not your average storm slab problem that goes away in a day or two. You might get away with being on a steep slope, but you're taking a gamble if you're doing that, and just because you didn't trigger a deadly avalanche on one doesn't mean you won't on another slope.
Many avalanches are failing within the new snow 6-16 inches deep, some occurred at the new/old snow interface, but we've had a couple reports that human-triggered avalanches stepped down to the 1/10 crust and surrounding facet (weak) layers. We've got an irregular patchwork of layers beneath the new 2-3+ft of snow. That weakness is about a foot beneath the new snow layer, resulting in larger avalanches that could propagate further than what you'd expect. This is very alarming, and warrants treating the backcountry with extreme caution.
The issue is the spread of the weak layers, which one individual described as "consistently inconsistent." You may find the weakness and potential resulting avalanches in one spot but not a few feet away, so trying to outsmart this problem is not the right way to manage it- your best option is to avoid all steep terrain and let it rest. If you see natural avalanches, experience large whumphs or shooting cracks, or remotely trigger an avalanche, take a step back and avoid traveling beneath large paths as well. You can still have a good day in the backcountry- just stick to lower-angle terrain.
It's been windy, and slabs are thicker and deeper in wind-loaded spots. Triggering an avalanche in one of these spots will probably be easier, and could provide more weight to impact a deeper layer.
Example photo: Shallower and deeper avalanches, both of which are ones that you could trigger on Sunday.
Photo: Jason Speer