Avalanche Forecast
Issued: Feb 21st, 2019 10:00AM
The alpine rating is , the treeline rating is , and the below treeline rating is Known problems include Wind Slabs and Persistent Slabs.
NWAC,
Northwest Avalanche Center
This isn’t a big cascade storm, but the winds will be plenty strong to form new wind slabs throughout the Friday. Pay attention to areas where the wind affected the snow. If you see snow drifts or blowing snow, steer away from opens slopes greater than 35 degrees.
Summary
Discussion
It’s been a quiet couple of days in the Mt Baker backcountry. With the break in the weather, avalanche activity has been limited to small shallow wind slabs and a few loose snow avalanches. The last major avalanche likely occurred February 17 near Iceberg Lake.
Even though this storm Friday isn’t very large, it may be adding to the slab over some shallowly buried weak snow layers. On Tuesday night, a few inches of snow buried surface hoar, facets, and/or a melt-freeze crust in some locations. This few inches of snow was not enough snow to cause a problem. As we add more snow Friday, this could push these shallowly buried weak layers to the edge. Keep this recently buried layer in mind, especially at mid and lower elevations, where it is the most likely to have survived.
Feathery surface hoar (6-8mm) found in the Twin Lakes/Hwy 542 area. 02/17/19 Anjin Herndon Photo
Even though the regional differences in the persistent/deep persistent slab, there enough similarities to make avalanche observations pertinent. On Wednesday, three skiers exited Crystal Mt ski resort traveling west towards Hwy 410. The first skier on the slope triggered a very large avalanche but was able to ski out before getting caught. Crystal Mt Ski Patrol visited the site on Thursday. The avalanche was 3 ft deep, 200 ft wide, and classified as a SS-ASu-D3-R2.5-O. 6300 ft. WSW aspect. Slope angle 36 degrees. The involved party descended to Hwy 410 without incident. Also on Wednesday, Crystal Mt Ski Patrol triggered a very large persistent slab as part of avalanche mitigation measures. This avalanche occurred on a SE aspect at 6300’.
Looking down on the crown of a skier triggered avalanche near Crystal Mt. Photo: Crystal Mt Ski Patrol
Snowpack Discussion
February 19th, 2019
Recap
We’re now over a week out from a major winter storm and avalanche cycle that left a string of school cancellations and avalanche near misses in its wake. As with snowfall amounts, the avalanche cycles have been similar, but not identical in all regions. The further we’re getting from the peak of the cycle, the more variation in avalanche conditions we’re seeing between regions and even within individual zones. Variable snow totals from storms this week are further adding to the range of conditions you will encounter. In some places, these storms may add stress to existing weak layers.
In the days after the natural cycle, it was obvious that you could trigger an avalanche. Large crowns were visible and you could feel and hear collapses in many zones. Managing your risk was easy. Avoid avalanche terrain. Since the natural avalanche cycle quieted down, the main concern for avalanches has focussed on the February 8th facets in regions where the weak layer is problematic.
A natural persistent slab (D2) on a north aspect at 4200 ft low in Glacier Creek drainage (Hwy 542). 02/13/19 Lee Lazzara Photo
Variability and Mixed Messages
As the time moves on and the snowpack structure changes, we’re seeing the potential for triggering avalanches change as well. The February 8th layer is rounding (strengthening) and the likelihood of triggering an avalanche on it is decreasing. So much so that the problem is trending to unlikely in some regions. Unfortunately, the consequences (size and destructive potential) remain the same if you do trigger an avalanche on this layer.
These conditions are commonly described as "low probability - high consequence" scenarios. Under these circumstances, common clues may paint a conflicting picture and snowpack tests become even more difficult to interpret (snowpack tests often don’t give us a clear “go or no-go” answer, if such a thing exists).
Q: How do we manage our risk when observations are contradictory and difficult to interpret?
A: When avalanche conditions are complicated, defer to less consequential and simpler. Prioritize obvious clues, like recent avalanches, shooting cracks, or collapses. Focus on other observations that indicate a potential to trigger avalanches. Snowpack tests are just one piece of the decision-making puzzle. Lean on them as reasons to reduce your groups' exposure to avalanche terrain. Don’t use them to justify traveling in more consequential terrain.
A natural persistent slab avalanche (D2), likely occurred on 2/12 on southwest through southeast aspects of Windy Mountain at 5,400ft in the Tye River drainage. Photo: Dan Veenhuizen.
Case Study
On the 17th I dug a profile, east of Stevens Pass on a north-northeast aspect at 4,127ft. I found the February 8th facets (0.5-1.5mm) rounding and buried 59cm from the surface. After much investigation, I found the following results at the February 8th interface: CTH (SP), ECTN28, PST 45/100 (END), 5 yellow flags (structural indicators). Later that day, about 2000 linear feet away from the profile site at the same elevation and slightly different aspect, we experienced a massive rumbling collapse.
All this crypto snow-speak means that some of the observations I made indicated that triggering an avalanche was likely, but some did not. Depending on your interpretation, some results could be argued either way. Confusing, right?
With all of this data in my field book, it was the collapse that stuck out. It was enough evidence for me to avoid slopes steeper than 35 degrees. That was a more obvious answer than all the other data I gathered and it’s the easiest to interpret. Without the collapse, I would have prioritized the test results that indicated I could have triggered a slide.
Problems
Wind Slabs
The winds on Friday are expected to be strong enough to easily transport snow and form new wind slabs. As these fresh slabs grow larger during the day, they will become easier to trigger and more consequential. Keep your eyes open for signs that the winds are transporting the snow. Simple observations such as the snow blown out of the trees, blowing snow, and snow drifts all indicate that wind slabs are forming on lee slopes. If you suspect wind affected snow, avoid open slopes greater than 35 degrees.
Release of a cohesive layer of snow (a slab) formed by the wind. Wind typically transports snow from the upwind sides of terrain features and deposits snow on the downwind side. Wind slabs are often smooth and rounded and sometimes sound hollow, and can range from soft to hard. Wind slabs that form over a persistent weak layer (surface hoar, depth hoar, or near-surface facets) may be termed Persistent Slabs or may develop into Persistent Slabs.
Wind Slabs form in specific areas, and are confined to lee and cross-loaded terrain features. They can be avoided by sticking to sheltered or wind-scoured areas..
Wind Slab avalanche. Winds blew from left to right. The area above the ridge has been scoured, and the snow drifted into a wind slab on the slope below.
Wind slabs can take up to a week to stabilize. They are confined to lee and cross-loaded terrain features and can be avoided by sticking to sheltered or wind scoured areas.
Aspects: All aspects.
Elevations: Alpine, Treeline.
Likelihood
Expected Size
Persistent Slabs
The lack of recent avalanches on the buried weak layer is compelling, but don’t confuse this lack of activity with a safe snowpack. Numerous snow profiles and snowpack tests demonstrate mixed results. The only conclusions we can really draw are the weak layer is becoming harder to trigger, and it doesn’t exist in all locations. Don’t expect obvious signs of unstable snow such as collapses or shooting cracks. If you dig in the snow, you may find a weak layer of buried surface hoar and/or facets 2-3 feet below the snow surface. In areas where you suspect this weak layer exists, it may be prudent to avoid large, open slopes greater than 35 degrees.
Release of a cohesive layer of soft to hard snow (a slab) in the middle to upper snowpack, when the bond to an underlying persistent weak layer breaks. Persistent layers include: surface hoar, depth hoar, near-surface facets, or faceted snow. Persistent weak layers can continue to produce avalanches for days, weeks or even months, making them especially dangerous and tricky. As additional snow and wind events build a thicker slab on top of the persistent weak layer, this avalanche problem may develop into a Deep Persistent Slabs.
The best ways to manage the risk from Persistent Slabs is to make conservative terrain choices. They can be triggered by light loads and weeks after the last storm. The slabs often propagate in surprising and unpredictable ways. This makes this problem difficult to predict and manage and requires a wide safety buffer to handle the uncertainty.
This Persistent Slab was triggered remotely, failed on a layer of faceted snow in the middle of the snowpack, and crossed several terrain features.
Persistent slabs can be triggered by light loads and weeks after the last storm. You can trigger them remotely and they often propagate across and beyond terrain features that would otherwise confine wind and storm slabs. Give yourself a wide safety buffer to handle the uncertainty.
Aspects: All aspects.
Elevations: All elevations.
Likelihood
Expected Size
Valid until: Feb 22nd, 2019 10:00AM
