Persistent Slabs
- Alpine
- Treeline
- Below treeline
- Likelihood
- Possible
- Size
- 1–2
Ben observed natural slab avalanches near Bull Trout Point (observation, photos to the right and below). These slabs likely failed on weak snow that developed at the surface during the drought of January and early February.
The majority of these slabs failed on shadier aspects between 8,000 and 8,500'. This band seems to have the ideal combination of slab formation and a well-preserved weak layer. Why? It's stayed mostly dry; high enough to escape much of the rain, and shaded enough to avoid melting in the sun. It's protected. This band is near the upper/middle elevation transition, so it's just low enough to avoid being heavily weathered by the wind.
These avalanches are likely to behave in ways that surprise you. They can wrap around terrain features like ridges and may be triggered remotely—from flatter terrain below, above, and to the sides of steep slopes. These are not your more predictable, run-of-the-mill wind slabs. Simply looking for and avoiding areas of wind-drifted snow is not enough. Let's all take a big, collective step back as we learn more about how this problem will behave.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSIONKeep your eyes peeled for wind slabs at upper elevations. Expect to encounter stiff drifts near ridgelines, in chutes and couloirs, and on aprons below gullies. Think about the consequences of triggering a small wind slab avalanche before committing to serious, consequential terrain.
(3/1/2022) These slab avalanches failed on N/NE facing slopes at 8,300-8,500' near Banner Summit. Based on their location and the appearance of the crowns they likely failed on a layer of weak snow underneath. You can see that the bed surface has a grey/dark appearance to it, which is generally an indicator of faceted grains.