Persistent Slabs
- Alpine
- Treeline
- Below treeline
- Likelihood
- Possible
- Size
- 1.5–2
Monday, we observed several snowmobile-triggered avalanches near Council Mountain (read observation here). These avalanches ranged in size, but most were large enough to bury, injure, or kill a person. Common characteristics that we found were:
- Avalanches failed on a layer of buried surface hoar from January that ranged in depth from 40 cm (16") to 110 cm (3.5 ft.)
- These avalanches were on NE-facing slopes between 7200-7400 feet
- These avalanches were in pockets of wind-sheltered terrain(pictured at right) that had been loaded by Sunday's storm
Yesterday (Wednesday), we were in the northeast corner of our advisory area in the Lick Creek zone. We observed a stable, right-side up snowpack. We did not observe evidence of any avalanche activity on buried weak layers. We did not observe propagation in ECTs. Professionals who had been skiing in the zone since Sunday's storm reiterated these findings.
Buried weak layers, particularly surface hoar, are spotty and can be difficult to find. We know the possibility of triggering an avalanche on buried weak layers from January are more likely in the West Mountain/Council Mountain zone, especially in terrain features described above. I would avoid these suspected terrain features, especially in the southwest part of the advisory area.
(2/6/2023)
Avalanches such as these are possible in pockets that were protected just enough from the wind to preserve older weak layers
Photo: Studley