Avalanche Forecast

Archived

Feb 24th, 2019–Feb 25th, 2019

Alpine

Natural avalanches unlikely, human triggered possible.

Treeline

Natural avalanches unlikely, human triggered possible.

Below Treeline

Natural avalanches unlikely, human triggered possible.

Alpine

Natural avalanches unlikely, human triggered possible.

Treeline

Natural avalanches unlikely, human triggered possible.

Below Treeline

Natural avalanches unlikely, human triggered possible.

Regions

Stevens Pass.

Snow totals from the last three days (~1.5 feet), easterly wind, and old weak layers of snow are keeping avalanches possible. You can trigger wind slab avalanches on open slopes at upper elevations, and large deep slab avalanches remain possible throughout the zone. Choose well-supported terrain and limit your exposure to slopes where avalanches can start.

Discussion

Snow and Avalanche Discussion

Close to 1.5 feet of low-density snow has accumulated since February 22nd. Observers reported dry loose avalanches on steeper slopes in the new snow on Saturday. East wind drifted the snow on Sunday and may continue into Monday. With clearing skies and sun on Monday, you may see some small loose wet avalanches on steep sun-exposed slopes. The recent snowfall has buried a mix of surface hoar and near surface facets on shaded aspects, and melt-freeze crust on southerly aspects.

Snowpack Discussion

February 24th, 2019

The Status Quo

As we look at the avalanche conditions the phrase “Status Quo” keeps coming to mind. We use this term in the avalanche industry to note periods of no substantial changes, where observations continue to support the current avalanche danger, and our terrain use doesn’t appreciably change. We’ll look at recent avalanche conditions with this lens.

Avalanches

Following several large winter storms just prior to Valentine's Day, we saw very active avalanche conditions. With a few notable exceptions, most of the avalanche activity occurred more than a week ago. This lack of activity has allowed us to gain some confidence with the persistent weak layer buried on February 8th. You can see this reflected in the progression in the likelihood of persistent slab avalanches from “Likely,” to “Possible,” to “Unlikely.” The timing of this progression has been different depending on the zone.

The recent exceptions were two very large avalanches in the Crystal Mountain area on February 20th. During avalanche mitigation work, Crystal Mountain Ski Patrol triggered a slide on a SE aspect at 6300 ft in a less often skied portion of their ski area. On the same day, a skier triggered a persistent slab on a W aspect at 6300 ft in the backcountry adjacent to the ski area. Both were 3-4 ft deep. It’s hard to ignore these two obvious signs of instability.

Feb 20, 2019: SE 6300’: SS-AE-D3-R3-O. Photo: Crystal Mt Ski Patrol

Snowpack

Snow profiles and snowpack tests have been coming in from nearly every region. This is great! It helps us put together a more complete picture of the snowpack structure. Observers continue to report a layer of facets 2-5 feet below the snow surface and just above a crust. These facets are showing signs of rounding (gaining strength). In the past week, snowpack tests have become more variable. Some tests are indicating triggering an avalanche and crack propagation (necessary for a slab avalanche) are becoming less likely. That said, we are still seeing other tests that indicate that triggering deep persistent slabs remains a possibility. More tracking of this trend is needed to concretely illustrate the trend.

The Feb 8 facet layer is 3-5ft deep in the Snoqualmie Pass area. Photo: Susie Glass

Weather

Our recent weather systems have not been big water producers, especially by Cascade standards. However, the colder than normal temperatures have produced light, low-density snowfall. Wind transported snow have been the main driver of slab avalanches in the new snow. These storms have been large enough to keep the avalanche danger elevated, but not enough for major spikes in danger.

Recent low-density snow drifted by the wind to form fresh slabs Photo: Dallas Glass

Looking Ahead

At this point avalanches on persistent weak layers can’t be fully ruled out on specific aspects or elevations in most zones. Your chances of triggering an avalanche on a persistent weak layer are lower than they were on February 13th, but the change from day-to-day will remain slow and incremental. As a result, you’ve seen slow changes in the avalanche danger in most zones. Due to the serious consequences and the uncertainty that these avalanches present, we will continue to operate with a “Status Quo” mindset. Don’t let this lack of change lull you to sleep.

When will the conditions change? Not tomorrow, but possibly within the next week or two. Keep checking the forecast. Make sure to read the Snow and Avalanche Discussion and the Avalanche Problem text so you can stay up to date with any changes as they arise.

Problems

Wind Slabs

Wind Slab avalanches are the release of a cohesive layer of snow (a slab) formed by the wind. Wind typically transports snow from the upwind sides of terrain features and deposits snow on the downwind side. Wind slabs are often smooth and rounded and sometimes sound hollow, and can range from soft to hard. Wind slabs that form over a persistent weak layer (surface hoar, depth hoar, or near-surface facets) may be termed Persistent Slabs or may develop into Persistent Slabs.

Deep Persistent Slabs

Deep Persistent Slab avalanches are the release of a thick cohesive layer of hard snow (a slab), when the bond breaks between the slab and an underlying persistent weak layer deep in the snowpack. The most common persistent weak layers involved in deep, persistent slabs are depth hoar or facets surrounding a deeply buried crust. Deep Persistent Slabs are typically hard to trigger, are very destructive and dangerous due to the large mass of snow involved, and can persist for months once developed. They are often triggered from areas where the snow is shallow and weak, and are particularly difficult to forecast for and manage.