Persistent Slabs
- Hochgebirge
- Waldgrenze
- Unterhalb der Waldgrenze
- Wahrscheinlichkeit
- Possible
- Größe
- 1.5–2.5
Problems #1 and #2 currently have a complex and overlapping relationship. Two primary layers of weak snow exist in the top meter of the snowpack here (and could rest deeper in areas that receive more wind). A natural avalanche on Mt. Taylor likely failed on facets or a crust+facet combination buried from all snowfall accumulated after March 20th. I found this layer on Shadow Mountain on Sunday as well as in the Snake River Range yesterday, however, recent human-triggered avalanche activity has primarily involved a layer of weak snow buried ~ March 30th that is now 2-3 feet deep. Both of these layers have produced failure in snowpit tests and it is worth adding the observation of the activity of both of these layers to your toolkit where you are recreating. Observations are sparse when you put an entire mountain range in viewpoint; both layers of facets seem most common on the middle to upper-elevation slopes ranging NE-E-SE in aspect. We don't often deal with persistent weak layers so late in a season, and it definitely requires a mindset shift. Triggering a 2-3+' thick persistent slab avalanche will remain a possibility this coming week. You're most likely to trigger a slide involving this weak snow on very steep slopes (steeper than about 35 degrees) where the wind has built slabs in recent days and weeks.
In areas with a weaker snowpack, such as the Wyoming Range, deeper weak layers still remain a concern. Triggering a wind slab or persistent slab on layers in the upper half of the snowpack could step down to deeper layers resulting in a very large avalanche.
(3/28/2023)
The third rider near or on slope triggered 1' thick soft slab from the diagonal track on the right. The slab slid on a slick crust with small facets on it that was buried March 20.
Photo: Frank Carus